CD Taki Ochi

Vlastislav Matoušek

* Shakuhachi and suizen
* Waterfall Asahidaki and Taki ochi
* CD Taki ochi
* Notes

Shakuhachi and suizen

           The shakuhachi flute 1) is now one of the main symbols of the Japanese musical tradition. Yet, till the mid-nineteenth century it was an instrument of religion, not of music, used exclusively by the Fuke-shu (or Fuke) sect of Zen Buddhism. Although they played the shakuhachi most of the time, the komusó (‘monks of nothingness’) of this sect were not considered musicians. The activity, which to the uninitiated might appear to be flute playing, was in fact only another form of Zen – meditation done by playing strange, esoterically handed down compositions, actually breathing and concentration exercises transformed into ‘music’. Together they are now called honkyoku (literally, ‘basic pieces’).

            This style of playing the shakuhachi, called Fuke, as it has been preserved to this day, particularly in the lines passed on at Myóanji (the temple of ‘Light and Darkness’, also called therefore Myóan ryú 2), is mainly a manifestation of Zen, of its emphasis on authenticity, concentration on the essential, and freeing oneself from externality. With typical Zen concision its basic principle used to be characterized as ichi on jobutsu (reaching enlightenment by means of a single sound).

The way of life of the ‘monks of nothingness’ was also highly unusual. As part of their asceticism one of their duties was to do takuhatsu at least three days a month, that is, to beg for alms for their monastery by playing the shakuhachi or sometimes for food for their bare sustenance. They also had the privilege of travelling without hindrance anywhere in Japan. In public they had to wear strange large hats made of rush (igusa); called tengai, they completely cover the face, providing anonymity. When necessary the monks often introduced themselves only by the name of their monastery and, rather than say anything at all, played the shakuhachi.

            During esoteric evening ceremonies in temples of the sect, the most serious and longest compositions were usually played – for instance, ‘San´ya’ (Three Valleys), ‘Kyorei’ (Empty Bell), ‘Kokú’ (Empty Sky) or ‘Mukaiji’ (The Sound of a Flute over A Misty Sea). Among the representative compositions of this part of the repertoire was ‘Takiochi’ (Waterfall).

 

Waterfall Asahidaki and Taki ochi

 

          Ryúgenji, the Dragon Temple Ryúgenji of the Fuke sect, was an important centre renowned for suizen (blowing meditation) practised by the playing of the shakuhachi. It once stood directly opposite the well-known Asahidaki waterfall near Shuzenji on the Izu peninsula. Once during a shakuhachi lesson while on my Tokyo study stay in June 1996, my teacher Kifu Mitsuhashi began to tell me a bit mysteriously: ‘The composition “Taki ochi” – Waterfall – was composed there. The temple was later destroyed, and it vanished without a trace. Only the composition “Taki ochi”, which somebody composed there a long time ago, apparently inspired by the magnificent view and, directly, by the sound of the falling water, is still played to this day’.

The idea that something as incomprehensible and ethereal as a musical composition could be the only ‘material’ remnant of a famous temple was truly fascinating to me. What’s more, it was a composition that should sound like ‘wind blowing through a bamboo grove’. That is how the mysterious ‘blowing Zen’ or ‘blowing meditation’ suizen practised by the mendicant ‘monks of nothingness’ of the Fuke-shú sect used to be described. What an eloquent reminder of the transient nature of our material world!

          My teacher then resolutely announced that this was the first composition of Fuke honkyoku (a basic composition in the fuke style) that I would be learning as of today. Here we would play together not only at the anniversary concert of all the teacher’s pupils, but also right at the Asahidaki waterfall itself! It is there that the teacher and his students set out every year to a sort of ‘Suizen’ meeting, part of which consists in playing Honkyoku compositions by the waterfall. ‘Wonderful!’, I said to myself, full of enthusiasm.

Two months went by and what had long been a dream came to fruition, though somewhat differently than I had imagined. I wrote in my diary at the time:

Saturday, 7 September 1996:

         8.30 am, awakened, still half in a dream, by the sudden call ‘Get up, get up, get up, Daddy!’, which my five-year-old daughter Veronika had recorded as an alarm on my Psion 3a. My wife Klárka quickly braided a single, long tuft of hair in the back of my head, and I set out to the ‘Kifu-kai annual trip of dedicating shakuhachi music’. (That’s the official name of the event on the leaflet, made also in Japanese English especially for me.) After changing trains at Shinjuku, this time without getting lost, I took the orange JR express to the Tokyo station. My ‘fellow-pupil’ of shakuhachi, the architect Yasuo Kobayashi, who beforehand showed a willingness to be my guide, reached the agreed place shortly after me. We easily made the next express train, this time to the Mishima station near Shuzenji on the Izu peninsula. Here, at the station, after getting off the train, is where we all got together for the first time. One of my older ‘fellow-pupils’ immediately dazzled me with a real monk’s mushroom-shaped hat. Fantastic! First we go together with the teacher and his women admirers for traditional Japanese noodles. Then three taxis take us to the Rógenji (“Temple at the Waterfall”), which is a bit farther away. We set out for the shrine in the rocks near the famous Asahidaki waterfall, in front of which once stood the legendary temple where ‘Taki ochi’ is said to have been composed. What I had imagined, something monumental like Niagara Falls, was quickly put into proper perspective. I saw an unassuming, narrow, black cliff, a few-dozen-meters-high, over which, with almost a gentle murmuring, ran water, before flowing away as an inviting little brook. I then imagined, however, what a mad torrent a little brook must become during the monsoon rains, and I began to look at Asahidaki with all due respect. The young priest of the temple, who led us to the place, rings a hand bell, and sings sacred texts for several minutes. Then, from memory, we all play ‘Chóshi’, the most basic of all the basic Honkyoku compositions. I noticed that several fellow-pupils had on their sleeves inconspicuous crib notes of the music. Well, well, well. Then, in the main hall of the temple, after repeated singing accompanied now by the striking of the temple bowl and the roughly forty-centimetre-long mokugyo (‘wooden fish’), we play for another two hours or so. Again ‘Chóshi’, and then finally ‘Taki ochi’, ‘Hifumichó’, and, without me, ‘Taki otoshi’ (see note 7). I enthusiastically take photographs and make sound recordings! We then play ‘Darani’, too, and eventually my master, Mitsuhashi-sensei, on the deeply-pitched flute called the nishaku yonsun (‘two feet, four inches’) plays ‘Reibo’ (Yearning for the Bell), among the most important Honkyoku pieces, said to have formerly been played especially at evening ceremonies in the temples of the Fuke sect. I recorded it all together with the fabulous sounds of Nature. One of the semi cicada even seemed for a moment to be trying to join in with the playing flutes or compete with them. The spiritual charge was extremely strong, and beautiful.

            In the middle of the session we all go a few hundred meters away to another, smaller temple, where we play ‘Chóshi’. In euphoria I photograph the splendid ancient altar. Then again we move back to Rógenji, and continue playing. Ultimately everybody rests, drinks tea and fortify themselves with supplies they have brought. In the meantime I go alone to the Asahidaki waterfall; something is irresistibly drawing me there. I install a microphone beneath the falls 3), and press ‘Record’ on my MD Walkman. I climb up twenty meters higher to another shrine in the rocks. About midway up the falls there is a plateau with a magical small lake. I wade up to my knees in the water and play ‘Kyorei’ (Empty Bell), said to be the earliest koten honkjoku composition. I’m carried away by the scenery, and wonder what will be on the recording. It should mainly be the murmuring of water, together with natural sounds, especially the voices of the semi cicada and perhaps, from the distance, lots of my still not quite fully practised ‘Kyorei’.

After my return, I couldn’t resist and chatted with that nice priest. His name is Shinjo Yoshino and he’d apparently once been to Prague! He eventually invited me to visit to the temple and even sojourn there, telling me I could stay and meditate as much as I liked, without any worries or expenses. A wonderful prospect! I’m really curious whether it will come to fruition.’
 

Taki ochi
 

        In the context of koten honkyoku – ancient basic compositions for shakuhachi – the various versions of Taki ochi are surprisingly similar. As is graphically clear from the following pattern all three versions presented here exhibit so many shared features that their derivation from the same model sometime in the past is more than obvious. The affinity of two versions of the Fuke (the first and second) is, moreover, so clear that they can be considered the same composition with merely stylistic nuances; they differ from one another only at the level of the characteristic manner (codified by the pertinent master or school) of performing the individual elements (for example, TsuRe, HaRo), which are parts of phrases that always last a one full breath 4). At this hierarchical level each version contains a somewhat different amount of elements that a single breath joins together into a concrete phrase, according to the standard principle of suidan 5). Several such phrases form the ‘themes’, the actual structural segments, of all three sections (A1, A2 and A3) of these compositions. In version 1 ‘Ryúgenji’6) an interesting difference is the first introduction of the main theme, a, in the lower register (otsu), which better corresponds to the gradual, generally musical arc of the composition. Version 2 ‘Fudaiji’7), where the a theme in the first part (A1) begins and repeats in the upper register (kan), in the second part (A2) it is twice below, and in the third part (A3) once again above, is, by contrast, more logical from the point of view of mathematical construction.

The ‘Kinko ryú’ version8) (track 3) shares far fewer morphological features with either Fuke variant, and exhibits a marked creative reworking of the model they share. It does, however, preserve the basic tripartite nature of the whole (A1, A2, A1'), and the main a theme at the beginning of each of the three parts. The consistent separation of the repeated introduction of the a theme (which has a varied head) with the insertion of another work constitutes an interesting reworking. Apart from the main a theme, the c and d themes are also clearly derived from a common model. In all three versions the d theme always includes (several times) the highest pitch of the traditional repertoire (kan no nishigonoHa = es3); it is also the most dynamically extreme, the undoubted climax of the composition.

            The main a theme (TsuRe with a triple repetition) is strikingly reminiscent of the beginning of ‘Kokú’ (literally, ‘empty sky’), the most played Fuke Honkjoku composition ever. It also begins with three TsuRe. The repeated phrase, which begins the e theme occurs in the same form also only in ‘Kokú’. That can hardly be a coincidence. Most likely, the anonymous composer of ‘Taki ochi’ used ‘Kokú’ as an inspiration. But who knows?

Vlastislav Matoušek, June 2003

Vlastislav Matoušek: Inside the Circle (for wind instrument, ad lib. ca 9:30, 1996)

          The circle and magic, the magic of the circle. Circle - the symbol of the seemingly unchanging, permanently repeating phenomena in our world of changes and delusion. The world where true reality appears to us to be something which is not from our world, and our world seems to be so real, although it is only the shadow - Inside the Circle.

Recommended manner of performance:

On the stage the performer places around himself on the floor 12 pages of paper, each with one line of the composition with numbers 1 to 12 in the shape of a clock face. Then he plays and walks around in a clockwise direction - Inside the Circle - as long as he likes.

         The composition can be performed even by a larger group of performers simultaneously. They each enter the Circle and start playing from number 1 as in a round at arbitrary time intervals.

 

Notes
 

 1) The shakuhachi, literally ‘a foot and eight’ (an abbreviation of ichi shaku hachi sun, meaning one foot, eight inches or 54.5 cm), is a long vertical endblown flute in the form of an open pipe made of a single piece of bamboo with five finger holes. The basic pitch is D1. The shakuhachi has a long history. It was introduced to Japan from China, at the latest in the Nara period (710–793 C.E.), as one of the instruments of the Palace Gagaku Orchestra. Eight examples of this instrument are preserved in the Shósóin treasury of the temple Tódaiji in the town Nara and, unlike the ‘classic’ instrument with five finger holes, which give the anhemitonic pentatonic D1 F1 G1 A1 C2, they have six finger holes and give the diatonic heptatonic, like the related Chinese siao flute of today. The name ‘a foot and eight’ indicates that this was once really the actual length (and therefore the tuning) of one of a number of flutes of various lengths, probably of tone-definition set of pipes without finger holes, defining the pitch of the basic notes of the scales in their transposition. They were commonly used in the music of China in the first millennium B.C.E. Sets of flutes like this probably served as the tuning norm for all kinds of musical instruments throughout the Empire, as did concert A in the West . Today, the name shakuhachi is also a term designating a type, and is used not only for standard tuning in D but also for all other variants of tuning (and therefore lengths as well!) and the number of fingerholes. Other particularly frequent lenghts 1.6 feet – shaku roksun with the basic pitch E1 and 2.4 feet – nishaku yonsun with the basic pitch A. This deeper variant of the instrument – nishaku yonsun – was used in recording (tracks 1 and 3), to underscore the timbre contrast among the various versions of same composition. By the way, it is precisely those longer, lower-pitch flutes, which are said to bring about far more intensively a better state of mind for meditation.

2) Ryú here means something very much like ‘school’, in the sense of a clearly defined style of traditional playing. Today, there are three basic schools of shakuhachi playing: the Myóan Ryú (after the Myóanji temple in Kyoto), insists strictly on the original spiritual meaning of playing as meditation in practice and plays only koten Honkyoku – the ‘old standard pieces’, of which there are about thirty. Less than one per cent of all players claim allegiance to it.

About twenty per cent of shakuhachi players belong to Kinko Ryú. This school was founded by Kurosawa Kinko I (1710–1771). He shifted the emphasis in playing from the level of meditation to the level of music, added a number of virtuoso techniques to it, and enriched the melody, particularly with the microtone flexions. With an additional three secret compositions polished and completed the Honkyoku to comprise 36 compositions. He and his followers also transferred to the shakuhachi repertoire a number of compositions and melodies originally intended for other instruments of Japanese traditional music. After the Fuke sect was suppressed in 1871, players of the Kinko school began to give preference to ensemble playing, especially sankyoku (trios) for the koto (zither), the shamisen (a three-string banjo-like instrument) and shakuhachi. They then raised playing technique to absolute virtuosity and refinement. In 1896 Nakao Tozan established one of today’s most popular schools, Tozan Ryú, which the vast majority of contemporary players claim allegiance to. The shakuhachi playing of this school came markedly close to European musical thinking and intentionally abandoned the spiritual aspect. Players concentrate on the latest repertoire, and do not hesitate to combine shakuhachi with any other kind of instrument. They play everything – I have even heard Smetana’s Vltava with piano accompaniment(!), as well as lounge jazz, a combination of shakuhachi and synthesizers, and a rock band.

3) The recording of Asahidaki waterfall (track 4) was done in September 7, 1996 at 4:10 PM.

4) In the Ryúgenji version (track 1) and Kinko version (track 3), to help orientate listeners of this CD, I have used the lower tuning of the 2.4 foot long nishaku yonsun in A; in recording the ‘Fudaiji’ version (track 2) and the composition ‘Inside the Circle’ (track 5) I have used the standard 1.8 foot long shakuhachi in D.

5) Suidan (sui – breath, dan – part, section etc.) – one of the most important standard principles of form-building in Fuke honkyoku. It means that each phrase, in the traditional transcription marked with a horizontal line as characters for fingering in the vertical column, should last one full breath! That is to say, it should last from the maximum inhalation to the absolute exhalation. The length of phrases determined like this can of course vary by fifty per cent or more from player to player. The whole composition will then last, for example, eight minutes instead of twenty and yet both variants can be the right ones.

6) I studied the Ryúgenji version of ‘Taki ochi’ (track 1) under the supervision of my teacher, Master Kifu Mitsuhashi, on the basis of a traditional transcription, which was written by one of the most highly respected masters of the Fuke style, Jin Nyódo (1891–1966).

7) The transcription of the version of the Fudaiji temple (track 2), which was, my teacher says, written by Master Chikugai Okamoto (1915-2000), I have completed in detail after the recording of the 37th master head of the Myóanji temple in Kyoto, Master Muchiku Tanikita (1878–1957).

8) In the title ‘Kinko Ryú’ version the character in the preceding versions read ochi is on principle read otoshi. It is therefore called ‘Taki otoshi no Kyoku’, literally, ‘composition of the falling waterfall’.

Bibliography:

BLASDEL, Christopher Yohmei: The Shakuhachi, Notomosha Corp., Tokyo 1988

FUYO, Hisamatsu: Hitori Mondo, in MAYERS, Dan E.: The Annals of The International Shakuhachi Society, Volume I, ISS, Wadhurst, Sussex, TN5 6PN, England, s.41-45  www.komuso.com

KISHIBE, Shigeo: The Traditional Music of Japan, ONGAKU NO TOMO SHA EDITION, Tokyo 1984

LEE, Riley Kelly: Yearning for the Bell: A Study of Transmission in the Shakuhachi Honkyoku Tradition, Dr. thesis manuscript, University of Sydney, dept. of Music, 1992

MATOUŠEK, Vlastislav: Systematika hudební řeči Fukezen šakuhači honkjoku in: K aktuálním otázkám hudební teorie, AMU, Praha 2000, ISBN 80-85883-68-6 www.musica.cz/matousek  www.shakuhachi.cz

TUKITANI, Tuneko, SEYAMA, Tóru and SIMURA, Satosi (trnsl. by Riley Kelly Lee), The Shakuhachi: The Instrument and its Music, Change and Diversification, Contemporary Music Review, 1994, Vol 8, Part 2, pp. 103-129 (Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH)

Musical Instruments in the Shósóin, Nihon Keizai Shimbun Sha, Tokyo 1967

Shakuhachi - The Encyklopedia of Musical Instrument (I. Kitahara, A. Matsuda, M. Matsumoto), Tokyo Ongaku Sha CO., Tokyo 1990  www.shakuhachi.com

Handwritten Original Koten Honkyoku Sheet Music by Jin Nyodo /B0104 /

 

Discography:

CD 3 "Anthology of Myóan-ji shakuhachi honkyoku", Yoshimura Sóshin (Myoanji 40th), KM-199501, Japan 1995

CD 12 Shakuhachi Kinko-ryú Honkyoku no Goro Yamaguchi, Victor VZCG-8069, Japan 1999

CD Kifu Mitsuhashi - The Art of the Shakuhachi vol.1, Celestial Harmonies 13224-2, USA 2001

 CD Kifu Mitsuhashi - The Art of the Shakuhachi vol.2, Celestial Harmonies 13225-2, USA 2003

      CD Kifu Mitsuhashi - The Art of the Shakuhachi vol.3, Celestial Harmonies 13226-2, USA 2003

      CD Misterious Sound of Bamboo-flute, Watazumido-Shuso, Crown CDP-1079, Tokyo 2001

      CD Vlastislav Matoušek: Kaligrafie - Calligraphy, Angel AN 99-006, Praha 1999
 

[ Close window ]